![](images/pixel_transparent.gif) |
It seems that for much of the 18th century the main focus of human activity on the plantation shifted to the north and east of the original 1610 enclosure and that the area around the enclosure was used either as meadow land or to raise crops. Only a few artifacts that definitely can be dated to the early-to-mid-18th century have been found in the area of the enclosure. These include a copper-alloy shoe buckle and a number of fragments of English scratch-blue stoneware. We also know that sometime around 1800, the abandoned pit originally dug to hold the cellar inside John Guy's storehouse was filled in. John Clements died in 1802 and, on 27 September 1807, Cupids planter George Smith entered into an indenture with Clement's executor, George Lilly, to purchase the land for 100 pounds to be paid in five yearly installments. Less than six years later, on 25 May, 1813, Smith sold all the property except from a small section at the eastern end to Samuel Spracklin Jnr. for 70 pounds. It was probably around this time that Samuel built his house on the northern edge of the 1610 enclosure just 13 ft. north of John Guy's original dwelling house. Samuel's house was erected right on the line of the inner defensive wall and just where cannon fire had created a breach in the late 17th century. Inside his house was a 7 ft. deep stone-walled cellar built from stones recycled from that wall.
The increase in human activity in this area after 1813 is attested to by literally thousands of artifacts including shards of creamware, pearlware and other refined earthenwares, fragments of 19th century bottle glass and 19th century clay tobacco pipe bowls and stems found in and around Samuel's house and in the 19th century deposits all over the site. After Samuel and his wife Mary's death, the house continued to be occupied for a number of years by their eldest son, Simon. A photo of the area taken shortly before 1910 shows the house still standing but by the early 1920s it had disappeared. We rediscovered and excavated the cellar from Samuel's house in 2000.
In about 1847 Samuel's younger son, John, built the house and barn that still stand at the entrance to the site. John Spracklin's son, John Jnr., sold his share of the land, including the house and barn, on 22 June 1925. The section of the property inherited by Simon Spracklin, and where both John Guy and Samuel Spracklin had built their houses, passed to the Ford family sometime after Simon's daughter, Mary Charlotte married Elias Ford on 8 February, 1855. Ownership of the land later passed to the Whalen family when Mary Charlotte and Elias's daughter Priscilla married Caleb Whalen on 5, January 1892. Priscilla and Caleb's granddaughter (and Samuel Spracklin's great-great-granddaughter) Ruth Baker and her husband Garland still owned that piece of land and were using it as a summer home when we arrived and began digging there in 1995. Fifteen years later, in 2010, the area was declared a Provincial Historic Site.
Images (left to right, top to bottom) 1. Excavating the cellar inside Samuel Spracklin's house built in 1813. 2. English "scratch blue" stoneware bowl fragment, 1760-1775 found in the post-destruction layers inside the 1610 enclosure. 3. Part of the cellar wall inside Samuel Spracklin's house. Samuel's cellar was built using stones from the inner defensive wall. 4. Part of a feather-edged creamware plate, circa 1760-1820 that was tossed into the 1610 cellar pit when it was being filled in in around 1800. 5.Artifacts found inside Samuel Spracklin's cellar. Left to right: Liquor bottle, 1870-1900; two stoneware blacking bottles, circa 1880: a wide-mouth stoneware jar, late- nineteenth or early twentieth-century. 6. Nineteenth-century clay pipe from the bottom of Samuel's cellar. 7. Bowl fragment from the bottom of the cellar with a profile of the Duke of Wellington, circa 1854.
|
![](images/pixel_transparent.gif) |